TAKE ACTION NOW and tell your legislators to OPPOSE SB447 and the attack on the religious freedom and conscience rights of medical providers in Maryland.
You do not need to be an expert. Simply enter your name and address, and we will automatically create and send your letter to state lawmakers.
Please share this action alert with friends and family. THANK YOU!
LEARN MORE about why Maryland Right to Life is opposed to
Senate Bill 447 – Hospitals-Emergency Medical Conditions - Procedures
EMTALA Bill Forces Doctors to Commit Abortions
Maryland Right to Life, Inc. strongly opposes Senate Bill 447 Hospitals-Emergency Medical Conditions-Procedures. This bill is an attack on the Constitution and free exercise of religion. This bill seeks to codify NOT the federal “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act” known as EMTALA, but the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ erroneous political interpretation of EMTALA under the previous administration.
The freedom to practice one’s religion is one of our most cherished rights. Federal law recognizes this and protects medical personnel from being compelled to do something against their religious convictions. Without comprehensive protection, healthcare rights of conscience may be violated in various ways, such as harassment, demotion, salary reduction, transfer, termination, loss of staffing privileges, denial of aid or benefits, and refusal to license or certify.
By enacting this bill, the Maryland General Assembly would be exercising religious bias and infringing upon the Constitutional right to the free exercise of religion guaranteed to all citizens under the First Amendment.
The State also would be in violation of federal Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states that an employer must not discriminate against an employee based on the employee’s religious beliefs. Employees cannot be subjected to harassment because of their religious beliefs or practices. Title VII requires employers to grant reasonable requests for religious accommodation unless doing so would result in undue hardship to the employer.
The federal “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act” known as EMTALA was enacted by Congress in 1986, “to ensure public access to emergency services regardless of ability to pay.” EMTALA requires hospitals that receive Medicare funding to medically screen, stabilize, and appropriately transfer an individual with an “emergency medical condition.”
While this proposed bill includes abortion as a required treatment for “medical emergencies”, EMTALA specifically directs care, where applicable, for both the pregnant woman and her unborn baby, and never mentions abortion.
This bill enables the abortion industry and abortion drug manufacturers to be grossly negligent and endanger the health and lives of their female patients with no consequences. By enacting this bill, the Assembly will be passing the burden of care to emergency room physicians to complete abortions or provide emergency interventions for women injured as a result of substandard care at the hands of abortionists.
Conscience right protections are common sense. Conscience-respecting legislation does not ban any procedure or prescription and does not mandate any particular belief or morality. Protecting conscience helps ensure that healthcare providers enter and remain in their professions, helping to meet the rising demand for quality health care in Maryland.