State Updates
Ohio takes aim at specialty recognition
AAOMS signed onto a coalition letter opposing recent revisions proposed by the Ohio State Dental Board regarding specialty advertising regulations. The letter, supported by multiple national and state dental specialty organizations, urges the Board to revert to a 2018 proposal that upholds established specialty definitions defined by CODA-accredited residency, ensuring patient protection. However, if the Board moves forward with the current proposal, the coalition insists on specific revisions to address concerns. The letter follows a similar effort by the group in January to advocate for bona fide specialty recognition.
Nevada proposes dual-licensee remedies
At the request of the Nevada Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, the legislature introduced AB 221. The bill would exempt dual-licensed oral and maxillofacial surgeons from anesthesia requirements imposed by the state medical board if they primarily practice under their dental license and already undergo inspections by the state dental board.
Currently, dual-licensed oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Nevada face an administrative burden due to conflicting or contradictory requirements from the two boards. AB 221 seeks to streamline regulations and reduce redundant oversight for these practitioners, ensuring they can focus on patient care without unnecessary regulatory hurdles.
New reimbursement cap proposed in states
Multiple bills have been proposed to cap both in-network and out-of-network fees at 200 percent of Medicare rates or 200 percent of Medicaid rates if not covered by Medicare. In practical terms, in-network rates tend to be below this threshold, whereas out-of-network rates are significantly higher.
AAOMS is currently tracking such proposals in Oklahoma (SB 787) and Massachusetts (SD 1569). Previously, these types of proposals were limited to hospital fees or surprise billing scenarios, but the scope now appears to be expanding.
CRNAs introduce proposals in several states
As anticipated, AAOMS is tracking 35 bills across multiple states aimed at expanding CRNA practice. These bills have been introduced in Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, and Virginia.
Notably, several of these proposals would grant CRNAs independent practice in dental offices. In many cases, they would also exempt dental practitioners from securing an anesthesia permit, undergoing dental board office inspections, or complying with other dental board regulations.
States are encouraged to coordinate efforts on these bills with their state medical and anesthesiologist colleagues to ensure a unified response.
Dental therapy gaining traction
Recently, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Oklahoma have introduced legislation that would allow dental therapists to practice. Currently, fourteen states allow for dental therapy in some capacity, whether it be statewide or restricted to underserved areas or tribal lands.
Caution urged on bills with craniofacial implications
A growing trend in state legislatures is the introduction of bills addressing gender affirmation surgery and procedures. Many of these bills contain broad definitions of the procedures included within this category and may inadvertently include orthognathic and cleft procedures.
Based on its experience at the federal level with the Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act, AAOMS is actively working to educate state societies on these bills and their potential interpretations, which may impact craniofacial procedures performed by oral and maxillofacial surgeons.
Such legislation has already been introduced in Kentucky and Virginia, and AAOMS continues to monitor developments in other states.
Oregon removes stigmatizing language from applications
After extensive advocacy efforts, Oregon has removed stigmatizing mental health questions from its dental licensure applications. On Dec. 13, 2024, the Oregon Board of Dentistry voted to eliminate “have you ever” questions related to counseling, therapy, or treatment for mental health and substance use. The Oregon Dental Association led the effort alongside the Oregon Dental Hygienists’ Association and other stakeholders. The changes align with the Oregon Medical Board’s language and aim to reduce stigma, encouraging licensees to seek care without fear of repercussions. The updated application language is expected to take effect by February.
Dualling Dental Compact bills introduced in states
In 2024, the Dentist and Dental Hygienist Licensure Compact became operational, with 10 states enacting Compact legislation. Bills are currently under consideration in Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas and Vermont.
Meanwhile, the American Association of Dental Boards (AADB) proposed Dental and Dental Hygiene Licensure Compact is gaining traction. The AADB has launched a legislative tracking map and fact sheets, though no states have adopted the AADB legislation yet. Bills are pending in Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.