Oops! Trump’s ‘sanctuary city’ penalties could cost Chicago $3.6 billion
A multibillion-dollar game of chicken is unfolding between Rahm Emanuel and Donald Trump. The Better Government Association (BGA) of Chicago is an independent watchdog, the need for which should be obvious to anyone with basic familiarity with the ways of the Windy City. Among other functions, it studies issues of importance to voters looking forward. For instance: the potential cost of “sanctuary city” policies in the face of the proclaimed intention of the Trump administration to cut of some or all federal funding to cities that refuse to cooperate with ICE.
Mayor Rahm Emanuel might want to rethink his defiant attitude, because the City of Chicago is desperately dependent on federal funding for its social safety net. Would Mayor Twinkletoes be willing to inflict pain on the city’s most helpless in order to protect illegal alien criminals?
Alejandra Cancino writes for the BGA:
The city of Chicago and sister agencies could lose at least $3.6 billion in federal aid next year if President-elect Donald Trump carries through with a threat to deny all funding to communities that refuse to help his efforts to deport undocumented residents, a BGA analysis shows.
Here is where the money is used in Chicago:
That said, the game of chicken now building between Trump and urban mayors has the potential to jeopardize resources for an array of critical services in Chicago from feeding low-income pregnant women and school-aged children to fixing roads, bridges and train stations. Federal funding also pays for hiring new police officers, retraining workers, as well housing low-income families and supplementing the costs of educating most children in the Chicago Public Schools.
Do you feel lucky, Mayor Emanuel?
Hat tip: Peter von Buol

FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Corey Booker: The Attention Seeker
- Rust Belt Revival
- Birth Rates and the Future of Civilization
- Forebears of Trump’s Reciprocal Tariffs
- There’s Nothing Free about ‘Free Trade’
- The U.S, Denmark, and Greenland: Irreconcilable Differences?
- Announcing the New World Trading Order
- Free Trade: Reagan and the Austrians vs. the World of Today
- Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Election Screams for Department of Justice Criminal Investigation
- Too Little, Too Late
Blog Posts
- Don’t forget Lexington and Concord
- It's too late, George
- A new lawsuit seeks to stop the open pro-Palestinian/anti-Jewish indoctrination in the Oakland Unified School District
- 'Boys will be boys' -- Musk-Navarro spat demonstrates the Trump administration is pretty ... adult
- Trump’s tariff plan is coming into focus, as all the world but for China gets relief
- Acting IRS commissioner takes a buy-out in protest because she doesn’t want DHS to know where the illegal aliens are
- 18 months to save the world
- A young boy is murdered, and the accused has a history of assaulting children—oh, and he’s also an illegal
- From Tuskegee to tap water: Why government health promises deserve scrutiny
- Rep. Ocasio-Cortez flies first class for the common man
- Do we need a national ID card?
- In the trade war, a revealing Chinese video attacks American workers
- Trump’s tariff brilliance
- Hands off our liberty, leftists!
- The Democrat party’s transgender albatross problem